Copyright Australian Institute of Family Studies, 1996. One copy of this paper can be made for the purpose of personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution to the author.



YOUNG PEOPLE IN FAMILIES WITH A NON-ENGLISH SPEAKING BACKGROUND

Ruth E. Weston
Senior Research Fellow
Australian Institute of Family Studies

5th Australian Family Research Conference,
Brisbane, 27-29 November, 1996



This paper represents a spin-off of analysis I had undertaken into the health and wellbeing of parents in the Australian Living Standards Study (ALSS).

The ALSS focused on the living standards of families with at least one child under the age of 20 years.

The research I am going to describe is based on families living in 9 urban areas and 2 rural areas.


THE THREE KEY GROUPS EXAMINED


  • 'English-only' families:

    Families which spoke English only at home

  • 'Sound-English' families:

    Families which spoke a language other than English at home;
    Parents in household described as speaking English 'well' or 'very well:'

  • 'Limited-English' families:

    Families which spoke a language other than English at home;
    At least one parent described as speaking English 'not well' or 'not at all'



I divided families into three groups as shown above:

I asked two questions:

First, to what extent do the three groups of parents differ in terms of socio economic status, health and wellbeing?

In fact, parents in limited English families fared less well than the others in all three respects.

My second question was: are those in limited English families likely to catch up to the other groups with time?

After all, a relatively high proportion were recent migrants

I found that a high proportion of parents in limited English families had no more than Year 10 of schooling.

This is likely to operate as a barrier for that generation to catch up to other families - at least in terms of employment status, occupational status and financial wellbeing.


The next generation

It can take more than one generation for some migrant families to catch up to the majority of Australian families. Indeed, parents may have opted to experience considerable hardship in their new country in the hope of improvingthe life chances of future generations.

My next task, then, was to see how well any adolescent children in these families were faring, compared with adolescents in other families. Secondary school children and school leavers completed questionnaires of their own.



The Sample

Gender, age and life course stage of young
people who participated in ALSS
by language group

Eng.only
%
Sound-Eng
%
Limited-Eng
%
Gender
Boys514750
Girls495350
Total100100100
Age (yrs)(a)
11-13272519
14-15272723
16-17242533
18-20212225
Total100100100
Life stage (yrs)(a)
At school768284
Left school241816
Total100100100
N2421260165

a) All except 3 per cent were between 12 and 19 years old





KEY ISSUES EXAMINED

My key question concerned the wellbeing of the next generation - in particular, what is the prognosis for those in limited English families?

I looked at 4 issues:


HEALTH AND WELLBEING

Those in limited English families differed from the other two groups in the following ways:

  • Health:
    • Lower proportion of boys and girls had chronic illnesses
    • Parents and boys viewed boys' health less favourably

  • Parents' view of development:
    • Parents were less satisfied with their son's:
      * ability to get on with peers
      * Physical development, coordination
      * General behaviour

  • Responses of young people:
    • Boys and girls were less satisfied with life as a whole, living standards, housing, and family income
    • Girls were also less satisfied with several other issues, especially their level of independence/freedom
    • Boys and girls indicated a lower sense of mastery
    • Girls indicated lower sociability



Conclusion

These results suggest that young people in sound English families were doing well in the areas of education, health, and emotional wellbeing.

Those in limited English families had the lowest socio-economic status.

Compared with their counterparts in other language groups, parents in limited English families seemed less content with their son's development, while girls in such families appeared to be less content with life as a whole and with several domains of life.

This pattern of results highlights the importance of taking into account parents' command of English when undertaking research into families with a non English speaking background. These groups are very different in terms of parents' educational level and in terms of the outcomes for parents and children in several areas.

Given that those with a good command of English are probably more inclined to participate in research, studies which fail to take into account English language skills are likely to provide a rosier picture of the progress and wellbeing of migrants with non-English speaking backgrounds.

Failure to recognise these differences in research may result in failure to identify and address some of the special needs of families with limited English skills.

My main reason for undertaking this analysis, however, was to see if the low wellbeing of parents in limited English families was also apparent in their offspring or whether there was evidence of improvement across the generations. The greatest improvement appeared in the area of education, with likely spin offs for occupational and financial success.

References

Dobson, I., Birrell, B., and Rapson, V. (1996), 'The participation of non-English speaking-background-persons in higher education', People and Place, Vol.4(1), pp.46-54

Mathers, C.. (1996), Health Differentials Among Young Australian Adults. Canberra ACT: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.