Long work hours and the wellbeing of fathers and their families - Appendix

Table A1. Wellbeing and work hours (raw means)

Notes: Standard errors are shown in brackets. The data for each group working more than 40 hours per week were compared with the data for those working 35-40 hours using t-tests. Significance levels are *p<0.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001. The data have been weighted and calculation of the test statistics take account of the survey design that involves stratification and clustering. Source: HILDA Survey Wave 1 (2001).

Table A2. Men working 41-48 hours, wellbeing by satisfaction with work hours (adjusted means)

Notes: Standard errors are shown in brackets. The significance tests are for the comparison with fathers with low satisfaction.The significance levels reported in the table are for the underlying coefficients in the regression model used to construct the least squares means. Significance levels are: * 5 per cent confidence level; ** 1 per cent confidence level; *** 0.1 per cent confidence level. The data have been weighted and calculation of the test statistics takes account of the survey design that involves stratification and clustering. Source: HILDA Survey Wave 1 (2001).

Table A3. Men working 49-59 hours, wellbeing by satisfaction with work hours (adjusted means)

Notes: Standard errors are shown in brackets. The significance tests are for the comparison with fathers with low satisfaction. The significance levels reported in the table are for the underlying coefficients in the regression model used to construct the least squares means. Significance levels are: * 5 per cent confidence level; ** 1 per cent confidence level; *** 0.1 per cent confidence level. The data have been weighted and calculation of the test statistics takes account of the survey design that involves stratification and clustering. Source: HILDA Survey Wave 1 (2001).

Return to Research paper 35